The Judicial Appointment Process in India

The Judicial Appointment Process in India: Understanding the Collegium System and Constitutional Framework. In India, the process of appointing judges to the Supreme Court and High Courts is governed by a mix of Constitutional provisions, judicial precedents, and committees. While the Constitution of India provides the framework for judicial appointments, it has evolved over time, particularly through the collegium system, which is the current method of appointing judges.

1. Constitutional Provisions

The process of judicial appointments is primarily governed by the following provisions of the Indian Constitution:

– Article 124: This article deals with the appointment of Supreme Court judges.
– Supreme Court Judges are appointed by the President of India.
– The President appoints a judge in consultation with the Chief Justice of India (CJI) and such other judges of the Supreme Court and High Courts as the President may deem necessary.

– Article 217: This article deals with the appointment of High Court judges.
– High Court Judges are also appointed by the President of India.
– The President appoints a judge of a High Court after consulting the Governor of the concerned state and the Chief Justice of India (CJI).

While the Constitution grants the President the formal power of appointment, the process itself has evolved over time through judicial pronouncements.

2. The Collegium System

The collegium system is the current method of appointing judges to the Supreme Court and High Courts in India. It is an unwritten system of judicial appointments, which developed through the Judges’ Cases (also known as Three Judges Cases).

Judges’ Cases:

The Judges’ Cases are a series of landmark judgments that have shaped the judicial appointment process in India. They are:

1. First Judges Case (1981) – S.P. Gupta v. Union of India:

– In this case, the Supreme Court ruled that the President of India could appoint judges to the Supreme Court and High Courts after consulting the Chief Justice of India (CJI), but the President was not bound by the CJI’s advice.
– This judgment gave the executive (the President) considerable power over judicial appointments.

2. Second Judges Case (1993) – Supreme Court Advocates-on-Record Association v. Union of India:

– This landmark ruling significantly altered the judicial appointment process. The Court held that the CJI and a collegium of four senior-most judges of the Supreme Court must recommend appointments to the Supreme Court.
– The decision affirmed that the judiciary had the primary role in selecting judges, rather than the executive. The collegium’s decision is binding on the President.

3. Third Judges Case (1998) – In re: Special Reference No. 1 of 1998:

– This case expanded the collegium system. The Court clarified that the collegium should consist of the CJI and the four senior-most judges of the Supreme Court. This formalized the system and made the collegium the final authority in judicial appointments.

Since these rulings, the collegium system has been in place for judicial appointments in India.

How the Collegium System Works:

Supreme Court Collegium:

The collegium for appointing Supreme Court judges consists of:

The Chief Justice of India (CJI)
The four senior-most judges of the Supreme Court

High Court Collegium:

The collegium for appointing High Court judges consists of:

The Chief Justice of the concerned High Court
The senior-most judges of that High Court.
The CJI and two other senior Supreme Court judges also play a role in the final decision-making process.

The collegium proposes the names of candidates for judicial appointments. These proposals are sent to the President of India for formal approval. The President is required to appoint the recommended candidates, but in practice, the executive typically follows the collegium’s recommendations.

3. The Appointment Process:

The process of appointing judges in India follows these steps:

1. Recommendation by the Collegium:

– The collegium recommends candidates for judicial appointments to the Supreme Court or High Courts.
– The selection is based on factors such as legal expertise, integrity, seniority, and diversity in the judiciary.

2. Consultation and Vetting:

– Before making a final recommendation, the collegium often consults with other senior judges, legal experts, and sometimes even the Governor and State Chief Ministers (in case of High Court appointments).
– The Government may also consult the Intelligence Bureau (IB) to vet the background of the proposed candidates.

3. Approval by the President:

– Once the collegium finalizes the recommendation, it is sent to the President of India for formal appointment.
– The President can seek further clarifications or delay the appointment, but in practice, the President generally follows the collegium’s recommendations.

4. Oath of Office:

– After the President’s approval, the appointed judge takes the **oath of office** and assumes their judicial duties.

4. Role of the Government:

While the government does not have a formal role in selecting judges, it plays a significant role in the process:

– Law Ministry’s Role:

The Ministry of Law and Justice acts as a liaison between the government and the judiciary during the process of judicial appointments. It is responsible for the formal submission of the names to the President.

– Presidential Powers:

The President of India formally appoints judges to the Supreme Court and High Courts. However, the President generally follows the collegium’s recommendations.

– National Judicial Appointments Commission (NJAC):

In 2014, the government attempted to establish a National Judicial Appointments Commission (NJAC) to replace the collegium system through the Constitutional 99th Amendment Act. However, the Supreme Court struck down the NJAC as unconstitutional in 2015, maintaining the collegium system.

5. Criteria for Judicial Appointment:

The collegium system remains the primary method for judicial appointments, and various criteria influence the selection of candidates:

1. Seniority and Legal Expertise:

Judges are usually appointed from among senior lawyers or existing judges of lower courts. A strong understanding of law, judicial temperament, and experience are vital criteria.

2. Integrity:

A candidate’s reputation for honesty, impartiality, and moral integrity is of utmost importance.

3. Diversity:

There is an increasing focus on ensuring diversity in the judiciary, including representation of women and people from different socio-economic and cultural backgrounds.

4. Professional Excellence:

Candidates often choose based on their demonstrated legal acumen, either as practicing lawyers or judges in subordinate courts or High Courts.

6. Conclusion

The process of appointing judges in India is shaped by the Constitution, the collegium system, and the evolution of judicial precedents over the years. While the system emphasizes judicial independence and autonomy, it also reflects a balance of power between the executive and judiciary.

Despite criticisms regarding transparency and accountability, the collegium system has remained the backbone of judicial appointments in India. Calls for reforming the system have surfaced from time to time, but for now, the process remains a key pillar of India’s democratic and judicial framework. Thus, the Judicial Appointment Process in India, Understanding the Collegium System and Constitutional Framework.

Stay tuned on our website as if any official information pops up then we will update you in minutes! If you want all the latest updates on time then join our student community on WhatsApp!

Choose the right career yourself by booking personal guidance from professionals on Mytagapp.com!